Writing

Analysis and briefings.

Longer analysis sits alongside shorter briefings on political, regulatory, technological, and market developments.

01The Governance Gap: Why Rules and Reputations Move on Different Clocks5 September 20263 min readCrisis communications & reputational risk · Public affairs & political risk · AI governance & regulation↗02The EU's AI Labelling Law Has a Compliance Gap Worth Pricing In5 August 20263 min readAI governance & regulation · Public affairs & political risk↗03Synthetic Evidence Is a New Reputational Risk Category, Not a Variant of an Old One5 February 20263 min readCrisis communications & reputational risk · AI governance & regulation↗
01Anthropic's IPO prospectus warns of existential risk, and shows the real cost of getting there30 September 20261 min readAI governance & regulation · Public affairs & political risk↗02OpenAI scraps release of its next agentic model over safety concerns29 September 20261 min readAI governance & regulation · Crisis communications & reputational risk↗03Trump rejects the UK's push for global AI safety guidelines23 September 20261 min readAI governance & regulation · Trade, geopolitics & European security · Public affairs & political risk↗04Glencore suspends a senior executive amid a widening scandal18 September 20261 min readCrisis communications & reputational risk · AI governance & regulation↗
Methodology

The site separates longer analysis from shorter briefings. Each piece works from primary sources, including government statements, consultations, filings, and designation lists, and develops a clear argument from the evidence.

AI tools assist with initial research and drafting on longer pieces. Every piece is then rewritten, fact-checked against primary sources, and edited before publication, nothing goes live without that review. AI isn't going away, and pretending otherwise helps no one; what matters is the choices made about how it's used, and this site is one example of using it deliberately and transparently rather than hiding it.